| D I D A S K A L I A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | ABOUT | JOURNAL | LISTINGS | STUDY AREA | CONTACT | SEARCH | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editorialby Jane Montgomery and Dr Jennifer Wallace
Complex Electra In Jane Montgomery's production of the Electra in the Cambridge Arts Theatre, October 2001, Electra was "tightly bound" in a giant Petrie dish, never stepping outside it for the whole length of the play. She was offered up to the scrutiny of the gods and the judging gaze of the audience. And yet under this experimental glare, Electra revealed the performative qualities of the part, in which minute gestures and cries did indeed give "angle and outline to the play". Never did the extreme limits and exciting possibilities for performance become more apparent. "On visiting this year's Greek Play at Cambridge, my first experience of the genre for more than twenty-five years, I find it affords one revelation after another", wrote Alastair Macaulay in the Times Literary Supplement. Montgomery's Electra was the most recent example of the triannual Cambridge Greek Play, a theatrical tradition of performing Greek drama in the original language which dates back to 1882. When the first plays in Greek were staged in Oxford (Agamemnon 1880) and Cambridge (Ajax 1882), the productions marked a significant development in the modern reception of Greek tragedy. Rather than thinking of drama in ancient Greek solely as material for scholarly study and linguistic training, classicists now were clearly also considering its potential as a piece of theatre which could be brought to life on stage. Yet that life always risked petrification, since the earliest productions drew their inspiration not from contemporary theatre but from classical sculpture and archaeology. The plays were unearthed and staged as curiosities; the actors, dressed in tunics and sandals, adopted poses which echoed those seen on Athenian vases. 119 years and 39 plays on, with the productions far from archaeological curiosities but now drawing upon the best acting talents in Cambridge, it seemed the right moment for us to ponder again the possibilities and challenges of performing Greek tragedy. We organised a two-day symposium, which examined Sophocles' Electra as theatre as well as text, and which drew in well-known theatre practitioners who had been involved in productions of Electra, in addition to academics who have studied and eloquently analysed the play. The production in the Arts Theatre was designed to appeal to a wider audience than simply classicists able to understand ancient Greek, by including English surtitles for the first time. So in the symposium too, we were keen to initiate dialogues about the play between enthusiasts from different backgrounds: Classics, English literature, theatre studies, psychoanalysis, modern Greek. A selection of the papers and discussion from the Symposium has been collected for this issue of Didaskalia. Since the speakers came from such richly different fields, the style of presentation varied considerably and those variations have been retained here. There were three conventional conference sessions in which invited speakers gave formal 20-30 minute papers, followed by questions and debate from the floor. And there were two more open-ended sessions, when a panel of theatre practitioners led a general discussion about the performance of Electra. In the evening of the first day, the symposium speakers and participants watched the final performance of Jane Montgomery's Electra. At the party afterwards, we were entertained by Stephen Evans's performance on his ancient Greek lyre and Jennifer Wallace's jazz band's apt rendition of Horace Silver's "Song for My Father", but neither is reproducible here! In the world of
Shakespearean theatre, the fruitful dialogue between the academic Jan
Kott and the director Peter Brook has become legendary. Could something
similar happen for Greek tragedy, where developments in the academic
study of plays influence particular productions and where theatre performances
in turn impact upon the analysis of the drama within academia? Over
the past few years, there have been some successful classicist-artist
collaborations (e.g. Oliver Taplin-Katie Mitchell) and an increased
academic research interest in the practice of ancient drama (e.g. David
Wiles; Toph Marshall; Rush Rehm). It seemed that, particularly during
the open-ended panel discussion sessions transcribed here, these conversations
had reached a stage of confident maturity. There was no panic on the
part of the classicists that they were being 'dispossessed' and none
on the part of the 'practitioners' that they were being asked to justify
themselves or their works in scholarly terms arguably inimical to their
vision. While Montgomery's Electra was hauntingly caught in a
loop of her own abjection, staring at a decaying corpse both at the
beginning and the end of the play, we hope that the symposium revealed
that there is great potential for breaking out of the rigid divisions
between academia and theatre and much life in the old tragedy yet. Jane Montgomery,
Victoria, Australia Didaskalia Home Page / Journal / Issue 5.3 Table of Contents Didaskalia Volume 5 No. 3 - Summer 2002 / University of Warwick / edited by Hugh Denard and C.W. Marshall / ISSN 1321-4853 © This website is copyright Didaskalia. Pages may be downloaded, printed, copied, and distributed as long as they remain unchanged and the journal is given credit for having produced them.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||